Prima facie Essay Example for Free

Prima facie EssayIntroduction concord to the bind, Rhino poaching is in no way shown as moral. The ethical issues I see be that people be ignoring the fact that this horrible act is occurring and many people who do know more or less it wont do anything about it, besides are able to waste time notice pointless videos. The You Tube interventions took a moral approach to help with the appeal. Although some were offended, the majority planetary houseed the petition and became more aware of the world around them. Utilitarianism When studying the supreme doctrine of morality as utility, we must first examine the definition of utilitarianism.Utilitarianism the effort to answer the question of man ought to do. For a utilitarian, the answer is guileless Act to produce the best consequences possible for the not bad(p)est physique of people possible. In this, liberty and handicap are treated as an equal. The end goal is to produce a general welfare or Arthurs collective wel l- being. Jeremy Bentham, one philosophical view we examined defined utilitarianism as the ethical system that adjudicate actions to be moral to the extent they maximize happiness, producing pleasures, and preventing pains.According to Bentham, there is a possibility of veracious and big(a) consequences however preventing suffering is what matters through pleasure and the avoidance of pain. John Stuart Mill was a follower of Benthams, and he came up with the principle of utility. He stated that Nature has places mankind under the governance of two independent masters these masters are pain and pleasure. This is an experience based principle. We learn through experience that we are governed through pleasure and pain.According to Brandts view on utilitarianism, if all you do is add up numbers, there still a possibility of producing an immoral force. Singers principles also exemplified this. In the condition YouTube Interventions to Save the Rhino, Utilitarianism is exemplified i n that there was a greater outcome for a greater number of people. Sure, some were offended, however in the cases that the petition was gestural, the rhinos and animal activists were impacted positively. Also, the new act allowing this method of intercourse will help when it come t other disastrous situations.Also, the whole world was able to be impacted. This effort had a mass effect on the petition. In the end, rhinos could be saved and a great idea was introduced, even the offended learned that their time was not being used effectively and hence had somewhat of a positive outcome. Deontology In the study of deontology, we use Kant and Foots philosophical views. Deontology locoweed be considered commerce-based ethics, and reason alone should be used when finding the moral duty this concerns and reason in turn will cause a respect for rationality.Kant believed that morally you should act so that the maxim of your actions stooge and should be considered a universal law morally you should have respect for human dignity. In this principle one should never for any reason endeavorionally harm someone who is believed to be innocent. Philippa Foot expands of Kants principle of hypothetical imperatives in an argument. She argues the Kant contrasts acting out of respect for moral law with acting from an alterior motive. winning this into consideration she believes is crucial to shape Kants moral Philosophy.All in all, morality can yet involve rational beings because only rationa l beings have the capacity to reason the way things are and should be and the ability to exercise freedom. Perfect categorical duties allow for no ifs ands or buts. Others are not, under any circumstances, to be used just as a means to amaze morality. In summary of this moral standing and the three forms of hypothetical morality according to Foot and Kant, If you indispensability x, you should do y, Because you want x you should do y, and because x is in your best interest, you shoul d do y.For Kant the number and third principles are one in the same. The article answers the supreme moral question Did anyone use anyone just as a means? The answer is plain yes. The multiple videos that were altered were used as a means to get the communication across about animal poaching. The You Tube interventions had a positive outcome however in that a mass majority was made aware of what was going on in the world and how much time the viewers were actually wasting watching the highly viewed frivolous viral videos.Deontologists would hold in with the interventions campaign. They wanted people to be aware of the issue of rhino poaching and wanted a petition signed so they included a link to the petition and urged people to sign it by noting that it wouldnt take much time. They also wanted people to be aware that the silly videos were simply a waste of time and that was noted. Deontologists would have resolved these issues in a very similar behavior because no one was hur t, they were just helped. Prima Facie Duties The prima facie duties introduced by W. D.Ross, a professor from Oxford University, argued that the right and the good are properties known intuitively and these duties may conflict holding only prima facie. There are no supreme principles involved. All focal points in the argument of what makes right acts right and maltreat acts wrong are taken into account when looking into prima facie duty. Prima facie is judgment based on considered opinion. The article doesnt really exemplify prima facie duties in that the article agrees completely with the study of deontology, and Ross argues with deontology.The duty to sign the petition however did arise from the obligation to save the rhinos from poaching. This exemplifies the opinion Ross had on duty in itself. Conclusion I thought that the approach this article took was completely effective and I agree that the awareness of rhino poaching was done morally. When others want to make you aware of things like the animal pelt industry, they walk down runways with imitation blood dripping from a fur coat. This was done in a way where most were not offended, a majority of people were impacted and action was taken.The petition was signed and an increase of 400% of the signatures was reached. I think that deontology supports the article the most. The x and y principles were exemplified as Foot and Kant had demonstrated. I think that all of the principles we studied in this section can be applied to the article. The article to the lowest degree agrees with prima facie ideas however. There are ways to apply it which I stated earlier in this essay. So what makes right acts right and wrong acts wrong? How many are influenced, how they are influenced, and act to include intent of agent and consent of person affected by act.