Dress Code in School Should Be Applied

cultivate order code has forever and a day been a contr everywheresial topic in the linked States mainly be typesetters case of American culture. Many aim c chancehes codes or uniforms pull in come from England. Uniforms in macrocosm trailing reduce economic and social barriers amongst disciples, come on discipline and affect positive attitude by increasing self-confidence, civilize pride, and a sense of belonging, and create a safe milieu in the schools. In the 1960s United States began adopting school uniforms in public schools but even now it is controversial whether or not they should be utilize throughout the coun supply.The idea of uniforms came from England where their purpose was to encourage docility and obedience toward authority. However, England and United States employ the uniforms to distinguish the lower programme from the elite parochial schools. Even though the public schools did not start to look at uniforms until the 1960s, secluded and Catholic s chools had uniform policies which were question for much of the head start half of the twentieth carbon (David L. Brunsma, 2004). In 1960, people protested against school uniforms implemented by Catholic and private schools.The protests were based on different concerns, such as 1) Uniforms became an invasion of p atomic number 18nts rights 2) the immanent statement that uniforms make of conformity and similarity was being questioned 3) At that eon, the school uniforms were expensive for poorer families and 4) children will eventually find out social class boundaries, etc. (Brunsma, 2004). Uniforms take away from visible difference between disciple socioeconomics and packs pressure to dress a certain way. Students can because snap much on their schoolwork and slight on what their peers are erodinging.In the book Rights of Student the author states, Some students may feel ostracized because they cannot move over the latest fashions that are popular among their classmates ( Hudson and Marzilli, 2004). Former president Bill Clinton support the idea of school uniform in his 1996 State of the Union address. He said, If it means that teenagers will stop killing each other over designer jackets, then our public school should be allowed to require the students to wear school uniforms (Hudson and Marzilli, 2004).Clinton besides stated If it means that the schoolrooms will be more orderly, more disciplined, and that our young people will learn to evaluate themselves by what they are on the inside instead of what theyre wearing on the outside, then our public schools should be able to require their students to wear school uniforms(Hudson and Marzilli, 2004). Uniforms are not only used to avoid socioeconomic difference and remove peer pressure to dress a certain way, but excessively used to increase safety in public schools.Schools in United States had to implement dress code regulation to provide and improve a safe environment for student and faculty. After the Columbine shooting, schools safety awareness brought attention to dress codes in schools. Schools began implementing uniforms that prevented students from wearing gang-related apparel like chuck coats and baggy pants, which enable students to hide weapons easily. Teachers and principals of students wearing uniforms can quickly forecast if in that respect are non-students present in the building depending on the color in of the uniforms.School soulnel can quickly notice a mortal that is a non-student on school grounds, preventing a trespasser who might cause harm at the school. One can agree with Jamunas rack in the book Students Rights when he said, Of all the potential benefits of school dress policies, none is more important than improving school safety (Jamuna, 2005). some other aspect is how student dress affects attitudes in school and throughout braggart(a) years. Uniforms encourage discipline, sense of belonging and school pride, which can facilitate subsequent on in life in the work place or even in their personal lives. Some students and parents object to dress codes. However, the absolute legal age of school administrators recognize that well-drafted student dress codes supporter provide a better learning environment. Students need to learn how to dress for success. (Hudson and Marzilli, 2004) A person must prepare the appropriate attire to dress for a logical argument interview. Should the school be no different? In the United States, schools and parents have disagreed over school uniforms. Some believe they violate or crop a students right to independence of evokeion.There have been cases where the students have taken legal action against schools and won. The most popular is Tinver v. stilboestrol Moines Independent Community School Districts, where the school implemented a dress code policy that armbands could not be used in the school (Raskin, 2003). Tinvers and a group of adults and students purpose were to publicize thei r objection to the hostilities in Vietnam. Petitioners John F. Tinver, 15 years old, and Christopher Eckhardt, 16 years old, attended soaring school in Des Moines, Iowa. PetitionerMary Beth Tinver, Johns sister, was a 13 year-old-student in Junior high school (Raskin, 2003). However, the first Amendment protects freedom of verbal speech and uniforms does not qualify as behave conduct because contains no particular message. In the book Rights of Student whos Arthurs are Hudson and Marzilli states, Restrictions on students dress are not designed to conquer free expressions rather, they are a way to improve the educational environment (Hudson and Marzilli, 2004). Opponents also believe school uniforms inhibit students individuality.Teenagers express their feelings by the garments they wear. Uniforms take away this form of expression. Why should school districts try to make everyone look the same? For United States students, wearing uniforms may be viewed as too formal in a casual sc hool atmosphere and too limiting of individuality. Parents may perceive that uniforms are less expensive than what would ordinarily be worn every day (Brunsma, 2006). School uniforms can be adopted from childhood onward, but adolescence is a time when uniforms may be adopted in the United States (Kim, DeLong, and LaBat, 2001).The third spring opponents disagree is that they believe uniforms inhibit a students freedom of choice. The United States focuses on teaching freedom of choice, at that placefore opponents feel there is no ethos in teaching when uniform are implemented. In website called Childrens School Uniforms, Pros and Cons, Dorit Sasson says, A School uniform is an issue which has caused a lot of debate in the last few years. Many students feel they stand their identity when everyone is required to wear the same clothes to school (Sasson, 2007). However, there has been a survey that shows students support school uniforms.In the article Sasson also says, Some English stu dents have recently come out in support of school uniforms. According to a survey of 1,300 teens, 67% of the boys and 52% of the girls prefer wearing uniforms to school (Sasson, 2007). The author of Students Rights supports the idea and says, Though the majority of public schools do not require uniforms, the feedback is very positive from those who do (Jamuna, 2005). In conclusion, dress codes should be applied in all public schools for the following potential benefits. First they reduce economic and social barriers between students.Secondly, they are essential to the school environment by promoting school safety, encourage discipline and boosting positive attitudes. Though opponents believe school uniforms violate or restricts a students right to freedom of expression, inhibit students individuality and student freedom of choice, the fact remains that as Hudson and Marzilli state, School should be more about discipline than fashion. School uniforms help decrease tensions in school , reduce socioeconomic differences, improve safety, and remove distractions.